Teams

Bennett, Connie

2026 HOA Adult 18 & Over Daytime League 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-12-01vs Jensen, PattyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDelane Cohen / Anne Miller vs Lisa Erickson / Angel Krishna7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Tushaus / Nancy Connell vs Maria Hedrick / Tara Gatti6-4, 6-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Wood / Candace Herman vs Patty Jensen / Susan Ackerman6-2, 6-2
2025-11-17vs Butler, LisaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goetz / Candace Herman vs Maryalice Williams / Beth Welsh6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNatalie Neal / Nancy Kitts vs Lisa Butler / Kim Dunmire3-6, 1-6
2025-11-10vs Holt, KaitlinLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Goetz / Cathy Czir vs Sara Gentry / Caitlin Porto1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCandace Herman / Barbara Wood vs Julie Mccann / Anne Grant6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeth Mundhenke / Delane Cohen vs Alison Armistead / Angela Strohm4-6, 3-6
2025-11-03vs Lytton, HetherLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Candace Herman vs Shauntae Morris / Diane Delaney6-7, 5-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Goetz / Stephanie Gunderson vs Lori Blinn / Hether Lytton6-7, 2-5
W#3 DoublesNancy Kitts / Delane Cohen vs Loras Heck / Sheila Mccarrick6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-10-27vs Vitha, DawnWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Miller / Delane Cohen vs Dawn Vitha / Jennifer Carlisle6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCandace Herman / Julie Tushaus vs Jennifer Haake / Heidi Hoggatt2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Nancy Connell vs Alice Edwards / Janae Likens6-3, 6-1
2025-10-20vs Shapland, SuzanneWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaureen Goetz / Candace Herman vs Paula Flattery-Aaron / Hilary Petersen2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Tushaus / Ganga Perumparambil vs Lisa Thompson / Elaine Schulze6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne Miller / Nancy Connell vs MaryAnn Luchtel / Susan Geick4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-13vs Anthony, MichelleWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / Cathy Rinehart vs Maria Moore / Patsy Crystal6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCandace Herman / Ganga Perumparambil vs Shannon Maize / Begona Sanchez6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRhonda Gilstrap / Nancy Ifft vs Angela Witten / Amanda Mills6-0, 6-3
2025-10-06vs Luchinsky, KarenLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Miller / Delane Cohen vs Betsy Triplett / Melinda McCalla2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGanga Perumparambil / Natalie Neal vs Kari Lemons / KALEE WOOD1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCandace Herman / Maureen Goetz vs Stephanie Stevenson / Shannon Harris7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-29vs Marso, JanetLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Tushaus / Barbara Wood vs Kelly Peddicord / Robin Kistler3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Susan Ferguson vs Krissi Wagner / Rachel Morrison4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnne Miller / Nancy Kitts vs Jill Wineinger / Alison Borberg3-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs Weston, DawnWon 21
W#1 DoublesDelane Cohen / Anne Miller vs Dawn Weston / Mary Brauer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhonda Gilstrap / Beth Mundhenke vs Geniya Khakhalova / Carla Liebentritt2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Connell / Jill Cipra vs Connie Hucker / Stephanie Stadlman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Hughes, AllisonLost 12
L#1 DoublesGanga Perumparambil / Natalie Neal vs Leah Bailey / Diana Beckman4-6, 6-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Gunderson / Maureen Goetz vs Jessica Madarang / Sasipen Nott6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJill Cipra / Barbara Wood vs Rachel Capstack / Lauren Huey-Larson6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Luchinsky, Karen9226720249
2Lytton, Hether83181537313
3Bennett, Connie65171636309
4Shapland, Suzanne56191436310
5Vitha, Dawn56191436299
6Butler, Lisa56151839309
7Marso, Janet56141943333
8Anthony, Michelle56132043308
9Holt, Kaitlin56141943308
10Hughes, Allison38132045340
11Jensen, Patty38112250356

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Maureen Goetz
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.44
Delane Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Nancy Connell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Julie Tushaus
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Stephanie Gunderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Ganga Perumparambil
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Barbara Wood
published 3.5
3.21
Candace Herman
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Jill Cipra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Rhonda Gilstrap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Cathy Rinehart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Natalie Neal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Nancy Ifft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Nancy Kitts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Beth Mundhenke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Cathy Czir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Herman + Maureen Goetz241754% games+6.7% vs expected
Delane Cohen + Candace Herman10457% games+6.2% vs expected
Rhonda Gilstrap + Susan Ferguson19957% games+4.2% vs expected
Stephanie Gunderson + Maureen Goetz291554% games+3.1% vs expected
Beth Mundhenke + Susan Ferguson4450% games+2.9% vs expected
Natalie Neal + Beth Mundhenke9454% games+2.4% vs expected
Candace Herman + Cathy Rinehart231953% games+1.9% vs expected
Rhonda Gilstrap + Nancy Ifft5454% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Goetz
111W–104L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Delane Cohen
107W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Nancy Connell
40W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
Julie Tushaus
51W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Stephanie Gunderson
93W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Ganga Perumparambil
64W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Barbara Wood
55W–60L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Candace Herman
162W–139L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Jill Cipra
28W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Rhonda Gilstrap
67W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cathy Rinehart
111W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.09
Natalie Neal
77W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Nancy Ifft
71W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Nancy Kitts
38W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Beth Mundhenke
50W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Cathy Czir
47W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Susan Ferguson
56W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.