Teams

BMillikan/SARC

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexander Higgins / Brian Noga vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01Won 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Noga / T Brandon Brown vs Mickey Plowden / Mark Moore7-5, 3-2
W#2 DoublesBob Millikan / Gary Caiola vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Brockmann / David Peters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Noga / David Peters vs Christopher Turner / Scott Russell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-10vs MTreiresLost 02
L#1 DoublesGary Caiola / Bob Millikan vs Brandon Kessler / Jarod Styres3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Peters / Brian Noga vs Richard McClenny / Patrick Newsome6-7, 5-7
2022-04-03vs DFarmer 4.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Noga / Gary Caiola vs Travis Leach / Sebastian Zuhr4-6, 1-6
2022-03-27vs CVinson RRCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBob Millikan / David Peters vs Jose Len / Bradley Knaysi4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Noga / Justin Fejfar vs Bradford Aron / Donny Joyce6-1, 7-5
2022-03-13vs JKerr/KashWon 10
W#3 DoublesGary Caiola / David Peters vs Darin Meyer / Christopher Turner6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
T Brandon Brown
published
4.21
Casey Black
published 4.5
4.09
Gary Caiola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Brian Noga
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Justin Fejfar
published
3.66
David Peters
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Caiola + T Brandon Brown224 matchesnot enough data
David Peters + Gary Caiola123 matchesnot enough data
Gary Caiola + Brian Noga123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

T Brandon Brown
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Casey Black
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Gary Caiola
65W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.09
4
Brian Noga
62W–45L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
Justin Fejfar
86W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
David Peters
44W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.