Teams

Volley Llamas

2024 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-02vs Slice GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMickey Haller / Janet Davis vs Rachael Barnard / Allison Kermode6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChrista Edwards / Lisa Paulson vs Nicole Gonzales / Susan Fazekas6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Lofaro / Heidi Thorson vs Aurelia Bonham / Sabrina Jardine6-4, 6-0
2024-02-25vs Slice GirlsWon 41
L#1 DoublesLaurel Falit / Christa Edwards vs Rachael Barnard / Tricia Kezeli6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Lofaro vs Ariel Merritt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Padillla / Jennifer Kelley vs Nicole Gonzales / Melanie Devereux6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Paulson / Mickey Haller vs Allison Kermode / Susan Fazekas6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesColleen McKenna / Janet Davis vs Aurelia Bonham / Sabrina Jardine6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-11vs Slice GirlsWon 50
W#1 DoublesMickey Haller / Melissa Padillla vs Tricia Kezeli / Lana Wilkinson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatalie Plotkin vs Allison Kermode6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Janet Davis vs Rachael Barnard / Melanie Devereux6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurel Falit / Jennifer Kelley vs Nicole Gonzales / Susan Fazekas6-4, 6-0
W#4 DoublesLisa Paulson / Christa Edwards vs Aurelia Bonham / Ariel Merritt6-1, 6-0
2024-02-03vs Slice GirlsWon 41
W#1 DoublesChrista Edwards / Rosemary Bachaus vs Tricia Kezeli / Susan Fazekas6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Lofaro vs Lana Wilkinson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMickey Haller / Janet Davis vs Rachael Barnard / Allison Kermode6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Plotkin / Lisa Paulson vs Sabrina Jardine / Aurelia Bonham6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesLaurel Falit / Colleen McKenna vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-20vs Slice GirlsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChrista Edwards / Mickey Haller vs Allison Kermode / Tricia Kezeli6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie Plotkin vs Sabrina Jardine6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Paulson / Laurel Falit vs Rachael Barnard / Melanie Devereux3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Lofaro / Colleen McKenna vs Aurelia Bonham / Ariel Merritt6-1, 6-1
2024-01-14vs Slice GirlsWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Padillla / Janet Davis vs Melanie Devereux / Rachael Barnard6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMickey Haller / Jennifer Kelley vs Aurelia Bonham / Lana Wilkinson6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesColleen McKenna / Heidi Thorson vs Sabrina Jardine / Ariel Merritt6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#4 DoublesElizabeth Lofaro / Laurel Falit vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Natalie Plotkin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Laurel Falit
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Janet Davis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Jennifer Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Christa Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
Melissa Padillla
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Elizabeth Lofaro
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.77
Heidi Thorson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Colleen McKenna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lisa Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mickey Haller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rosemary Bachaus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Edwards + Lisa Paulson4355% games+5.3% vs expected
Christa Edwards + Melissa Padillla0533% games+5.0% vs expected
Laurel Falit + Christa Edwards4451% games−6.7% vs expected
Mickey Haller + Janet Davis0534% gamesnot enough data
Rosemary Bachaus + Janet Davis314 matchesnot enough data
Laurel Falit + Lisa Paulson044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Davis + Lisa Paulson134 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Thorson + Colleen McKenna213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Plotkin
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Laurel Falit
72W–57L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Janet Davis
41W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
Jennifer Kelley
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Christa Edwards
22W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Melissa Padillla
40W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Elizabeth Lofaro
16W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Heidi Thorson
26W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Colleen McKenna
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lisa Paulson
27W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mickey Haller
14W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosemary Bachaus
55W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.