Teams

IA-REG-Sundermann&Rath

Tri-Level- Nov. 4-6 · Tri-Level Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · Tri-Level Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Norman000000
2IA-REG-Sundermann&Rath000000
3KS-REG-Evans/Vinson/18&OverTriLevel000000
4MO-Reg-Kim/Trilevel000000
5NE-REG-Allison000000
6OK-Reg-Kuhn000000
7STL-REG-Peterson/Huchet000000
8OKWC-REG-Koors/Corcoran000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Kay Dileo
published
4.33
Sara Loetscher
published
3.63
Brooke Zrudsky
published 4
3.60
Greta Rath
published 4
3.41
Tami Lenton
published
3.40
Angela Ridgely
published 3.5
3.38
Cathy Dmello
published 3.5
3.23
Heather Sundermann
published 3.5
Aimee Walsh
published
Kala Ave-Lallemant
published
Mary Schumacher
published
Tricia Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Loetscher + Kay Dileo14070% games+2.8% vs expected
Brooke Zrudsky + Greta Rath213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Dileo
51W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
4.49
Sara Loetscher
37W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.33
4
Brooke Zrudsky
21W–22L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Greta Rath
139W–93L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Tami Lenton
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Angela Ridgely
156W–90L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Cathy Dmello
41W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Heather Sundermann
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Aimee Walsh
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kala Ave-Lallemant
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Schumacher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Miller
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.