Teams

MLF YELLOW

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-02vs CSUWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Maka Hammock / Linda Seals6-4, 7-5
2021-06-25vs FHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Pam Smallwood / Shirley Bullinger6-1, 6-2
2021-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Leslie Walker / Mary Rogers6-0, 6-3
2021-06-11vs HMTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Marcee Gustafson / Linda Berkheim6-2, 6-0
2021-05-28vs CSUWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacalyn Petersen / Katherine Prudhomme vs Deborah Lockwood / Bernita Sterling6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-22vs FHCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Christy Hilmas / Maureen Finn6-4, 6-1
2021-05-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Robin Mellifont / Leslie Walker6-2, 6-1
2021-05-07vs HMTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Lori Masi / Vivian Watson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Tracy Hutton
published 3.5
3.09
Jacalyn Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.08
Leticia Dunn
published 3.5
2.99
Carol Murphy
published 3.5
2.41
Wendy Sprague
published
Katherine Prudhomme
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leticia Dunn + Tracy Hutton6354% games−3.0% vs expected
Jacalyn Petersen + Wendy Sprague224 matchesnot enough data
Leticia Dunn + Carol Murphy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracy Hutton
71W–37L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3
Jacalyn Petersen
71W–32L career · type S · 8 lines in 2021
<1%25%75%
3.09
3.5
Leticia Dunn
38W–55L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carol Murphy
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.99
Wendy Sprague
25W–53L career · no lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
2.41
Katherine Prudhomme
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.