Teams

LATA40/Harrison/SSP

2024 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Men - 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-18vs LATA/40+ WESCOTT/CAMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesRolf Kiser / Jonathan Lipsi vs Ivo Vanderzijpp / Larry Ellisor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-14vs LATA40/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesDon Harrison / Rolf Kiser vs Craig Mucci / Andrew Kaczynski3-6, 1-6
2024-08-11vs LATA/40+ WESCOTT/CAMPLost 01
L#3 DoublesRolf Kiser / Ron Gionet vs Ivo Vanderzijpp / Larry Ellisor4-6, 3-6
2024-07-28vs LATA40/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesRolf Kiser / Jonathan Lipsi vs Glen Funderburk / James Whitaker3-6, 2-6
2024-07-03vs LATA40/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRolf Kiser / Eric Lang vs Kevin Felkel / Christopher Pricenor1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Geoffrey Penland
published
3.53
Matthew Isenhower
published
3.44
Rolf Kiser
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.33
Jonathan Lipsi
published
3.20
Randal Senn
published
3.20
Duke Taylor
published
3.17
Van Horton
published
3.13
Ron Gionet
published
3.12
Gregg Senn
published
3.09
Pete Kleemoff
published 3.5
2.92
Barry Myers
published 3
Mark Gardiner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randal Senn + Pete Kleemoff2341% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Isenhower + Duke Taylor314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geoffrey Penland
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Matthew Isenhower
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Rolf Kiser
70W–79L career · 8 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jonathan Lipsi
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Randal Senn
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Duke Taylor
6W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Van Horton
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Ron Gionet
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Gregg Senn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Pete Kleemoff
127W–159L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Barry Myers
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Mark Gardiner
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.