Teams

A.Sheehan 40

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-12vs J.TaylorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Baird / Kris Wordsworth vs Holly Camak / Jolyne Taylor1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMelanie Tharrington vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-11vs T.LeFevre/JPhillipsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Sanders / Kris Wordsworth vs Laurie Reiss / Christine Subasic6-1, 6-4
2023-04-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Gwyn / Nancy Harvin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Sheehan / Melanie Tharrington vs Kelly Creekmore / Carla Williams3-6, 1-6
2023-03-30vs E.SCHWARTZLost 01
L#1 DoublesKris Wordsworth / Stephanie Klinck vs Meghan Roy / Elizabeth Schwartz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-16vs P.CochranWon 20
W#1 DoublesKris Wordsworth / Martha Sanders vs Regina Davis / Kellie Snider6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Gwyn / Mary Dee Smith vs Paula Cochran / Toni Paladino6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Martha Sanders
published
3.56
Nancy Harvin
published
3.36
Melanie Tharrington
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Allison Sheehan
published 3.5
3.30
Allison Glenn
published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Gwyn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Nancy Baird
published
3.27
Julie Sandridge
published
3.19
Mary Dee Smith
published
3.04
Kris Wordsworth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Glenn + Allison Sheehan4347% games+1.9% vs expected
Lisa Gwyn + Melanie Tharrington4745% gamesnot enough data
Kris Wordsworth + Melanie Tharrington4254% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Harvin + Martha Sanders3241% gamesnot enough data
Kris Wordsworth + Lisa Gwyn314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Dee Smith + Julie Sandridge213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Dee Smith + Allison Sheehan213 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Tharrington + Allison Sheehan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Sanders
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Nancy Harvin
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Melanie Tharrington
86W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Allison Sheehan
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Allison Glenn
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Lisa Gwyn
58W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Nancy Baird
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Julie Sandridge
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
Mary Dee Smith
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Kris Wordsworth
59W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.