Teams

Br.Robinson18C2.5

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-04vs Am.Cantando18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittany Robinson / Crystal Beard vs Kathleen Lalor / Alex Snukals6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian vs Debi Booker / Julia Hughes5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-10-02vs Br.Shait18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesCrystal Beard / Michele Nowicki vs Lauren Fye / Beth Gildea2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesEva Stancil / Marilyn Gordian vs Ashley Noble / Courtney Phillips3-6, 0-6
2023-09-18vs Ma.Cambo18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Sweet / Michele Nowicki vs Molly Andrews / Madeline Cambo0-6, 5-7
2023-09-11vs Me.Dougher18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny Sweet / Marilyn Gordian vs Amy Whitaker / Melissa Dougher6-3, 6-1
2023-08-28vs El.Wallace18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Nowicki / Suzy Blackwell vs Ellie Gilmore / Stuart Gupton3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrittany Robinson / Crystal Beard vs Sydnor Coffman / Kristin Baddour6-4, 6-0
2023-08-26vs Ch.Felmet18C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Gordian / Michele Nowicki vs Claire Capps / Lauren Bean2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-08-21Won 20
W#1 DoublesCrystal Beard / Michele Nowicki vs Julie Helmuth / Tracy Stillwell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Gordian / Jenny Sweet vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-07vs Ke.O'Rourke18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuzy Blackwell / Marilyn Gordian vs Lea Ricks / Clare Mayo4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal Beard / Brittany Robinson vs Blair Burr / Sofia Switzer6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Michele Nowicki
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Crystal Beard
published 3
2.70
Marilyn Gordian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.24
Eva Stancil
published 2.5
2.19
Jenny Sweet
published
2.15
Brittany Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.07
Laura Yates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Nowicki + Marilyn Gordian311654% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michele Nowicki
88W–59L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Crystal Beard
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Marilyn Gordian
81W–48L career · 12 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Eva Stancil
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.24
Jenny Sweet
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Brittany Robinson
78W–99L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Laura Yates
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.