Teams

IRMSL/Anderson/50&Over6.5W

2025 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-22vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Fullett / Luann Anderson vs Tiffany George / Charlotte Biggs6-3, 6-3
2025-11-15vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Brimlow / Luann Anderson vs Brigite Babine / Tina Dyer2-6, 3-6
2025-11-08vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Fullett / Luann Anderson vs Susan Yeager / Tina Dyer7-5, 6-3
2025-10-25vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane Fullett / Luann Anderson vs Brigite Babine / Tina Dyer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-18vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Fullett / Luann Anderson vs Nancy Pribble / Kathleen Rowling4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-12vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesLuann Anderson / Jane Fullett vs Maureen Holley / Margarita Ponte4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Harbour Ridge/HolleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesLuann Anderson / Jane Fullett vs Charlotte Biggs / Susan Yeager6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
2.92
Dianne Chandler
published 3
2.84
Joy Muller
published
Jane Fullett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeri Faherty
published
Luann Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Lynn Childs
published
Mary Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Brimlow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Perelli-Minetti + Joy Muller4452% gamesnot enough data
Luann Anderson + Joy Muller044 matchesnot enough data
Luann Anderson + Kelly Perelli-Minetti123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Perelli-Minetti
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Dianne Chandler
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Joy Muller
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Jane Fullett
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeri Faherty
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luann Anderson
15W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Childs
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Murray
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Brimlow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.