Teams

Ch.Higgins18C

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.23 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-30vs Me.Golder18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Bauman / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo vs Colleen Brown / Jenna Raynor2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAlexis Galloway / Amelia Blankenship vs Claire Hying / Jordan Fieldstein7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMeghan Zerkel / Claire Songkakul vs Gwynn Thayer / Meryl Golder6-0, 6-1
2026-08-23vs Ma.Paul18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Walter / Chunhui Higgins vs Molly Andrews / Rebecca Reynolds6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSapna Varkey / Meghan Zerkel vs Leah Johnson / Keshia Green6-4, 7-5
2026-08-16vs Ki.Patrey18C8.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Alexandra Ventura vs Nora Lenahan / Audrey Yi6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharlie Trinco / Sapna Varkey vs Suyeon Kim / Jane Williams3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Megan Wu vs Nancy Pack / Julia Kim6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs Ta.Parise18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Higgins / Meghan Zerkel vs Shelly Kirkpatrick / Maureen Sredl6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Claire Songkakul vs Tanya Parise / Susan Fanelly6-4, 6-1
2026-08-02vs Me.Delorme18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Zerkel / Claire Songkakul vs Erin Piechocinski / Julie Cronin6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnna Walter / Diana Higgins vs Heather Remley / Virginia Griffin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo vs Julie Rogers / Hannon Thorn6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1An.Free18C40102779
2Me.Golder18C3072466
3Ch.Higgins18C2051234
4Ji.Darnell18C2163775
5Ly.Manweiller18C2163874
6Da.Weiland18C21451390
7Yu.Hager18C226613111
8Ki.Patrey18C8.51142659
9Ta.Parise18C12361277
10Me.Delorme18C12451398
11El.Sanchez18C03361297
12Ma.Paul18C031817104
13He.Williams18C0411122138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Anna Walter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.44
Alexandra Ventura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Alexis Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Meghan Zerkel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.23
Charlie Trinco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Zoe Dubrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Donna Bauman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Sapna Varkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.01
Claire Songkakul
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Chunhui Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Megan Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Diana Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Amelia Blankenship
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Elizabeth Heald
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Ventura + Claire Songkakul18569% games+8.3% vs expected
Chunhui Higgins + Claire Songkakul21861% games+6.8% vs expected
Chunhui Higgins + Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo9359% games+6.3% vs expected
Alexandra Ventura + Chunhui Higgins5164% gamesnot enough data
Zoe Dubrow + Claire Songkakul5161% gamesnot enough data
Charlie Trinco + Claire Songkakul224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Walter
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.54
4.5
Alexandra Ventura
61W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Alexis Galloway
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
Meghan Zerkel
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Charlie Trinco
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Zoe Dubrow
101W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Donna Bauman
24W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Sapna Varkey
81W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Claire Songkakul
107W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Chunhui Higgins
232W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
Megan Wu
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
169W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Diana Higgins
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Amelia Blankenship
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Elizabeth Heald
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.