Teams

CTL18/CLARK/CTC

SC Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 12 9:15 AM
Columbia Tennis Center
Sep 19 9:15 AM
Columbia Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs CTL18/Marrello/CTFCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephanie DeFreese vs Carter Hassinger2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLydia Salais vs Bayne Dangerfield6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-22vs CTL18/Auld/RKWon 20
W#1 SinglesLydia Salais vs Elizabeth Sullivan6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJanie Mucci vs Julie Fulmer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-15vs CTL18/BONILLA/CTFCWon 20
W#2 SinglesLizzie Weston vs Morgan Sweeney3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLydia Salais vs Becky Piper6-4, 7-5
2026-08-09vs CTL18/BONILLA/CTFCWon 21
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Gibbes vs Maira Trimble5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLizzie Weston vs Bri Walker6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie DeFreese vs Victoria VanderPutten6-4, 6-4
2026-08-08vs CTL18/Marrello/CTFCWon 21
L#1 SinglesMegan Coward vs Carter Hassinger3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLydia Salais vs Sara Marrello6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesHelen Grant vs Meriwether Galloway6-1, 6-3
2026-08-01vs CTL18/Auld/RKWon 20
W#2 SinglesStephanie DeFreese vs Elizabeth King5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Gibbes vs Becky Carter6-2, 6-4
2026-07-11vs CTL18/Marrello/CTFCWon 20
W#2 SinglesCarene Floyd vs Penelope Chavis6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesStephanie DeFreese vs Rowena Aase6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL18/CLARK/CTC5011410113
2CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC237817128
3CTL18/Marrello/CTFC237817142
4CTL18/Auld/RK1451021159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lizzie Weston
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.45
Elizabeth Gibbes
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Megan Coward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Helen Grant
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Stephanie DeFreese
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.35
Lydia Salais
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.26
Carene Floyd
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Janie Mucci
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Emily Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carene Floyd + Megan Coward5065% games+7.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lizzie Weston
92W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Elizabeth Gibbes
17W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Megan Coward
57W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Helen Grant
88W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Stephanie DeFreese
55W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Lydia Salais
64W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carene Floyd
36W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Janie Mucci
160W–182L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Emily Clark
48W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.