Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Howard Giles

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - CV · CV Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-05vs CV-LLW-Cathedral Canyon/MageeLost 03
L#1 DoublesDean Nguyen / Ryan Sheppard vs Andrew Light / Kurtis Magee1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMitchell Spaeth vs Chris Grow3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKenton Hems / Kevin Collins vs Todd Anderson / Richard Romero2-6, 3-6
2025-03-29vs CV-LLW-Cathedral Canyon/MageeLost 13
L#1 DoublesMitchell Spaeth / Kevin Collins vs Andrew Light / Kurtis Magee1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRafael Cobas vs Satoru Hidaka6-2
L#2 DoublesSean Pendergraph / Kenton Hems vs Todd Anderson / Richard Romero7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKevin Meraz vs Chris Grow1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs CV-LLW-Cathedral Canyon/MageeLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Collins / Kenton Hems vs Todd Anderson / Chris Grow1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Sheppard vs David Lapenat3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Meraz / Siboupha Sirimanotham vs Andrew Light / Kurtis Magee3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cyrus Modarres
published 4.5
3.96
Ryan Sheppard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.82
Sean Pendergraph
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Siboupha Sirimanotham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Allen Gapuz
published 4
Dean Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Kenton Hems
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Meraz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mitchell Spaeth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
RAFAEL PRECIADO
published
Rafael Cobas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Nguyen + Ryan Sheppard2346% games−5.6% vs expected
Sean Pendergraph + Kenton Hems123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cyrus Modarres
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Sheppard
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Sean Pendergraph
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Siboupha Sirimanotham
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Allen Gapuz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dean Nguyen
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kenton Hems
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kevin Meraz
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitchell Spaeth
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
RAFAEL PRECIADO
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rafael Cobas
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.