Teams

RYasin-DUR

2025 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-24vs CLynch-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Millard / Andrew Hedgpeth vs John Chiles / Conor Lynch6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ross / Ra Yasin vs Kevin Winn / Joseph Davis7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Pobst / Adam Williamson vs Tom Luben / Jordan Nader6-0, 6-0
2025-09-17vs JByrd6.5-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesYung Hung Chang / Adam Williamson vs Alex Piasecki / Casey Collins1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVarunkumar Kontamukkala / Dhaval Bajaria vs Kevin Williams / Chris Wasko2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Franklin / Andrew Hedgpeth vs Stephen Thompson / Devohn Vines2-6, 0-6
2025-09-10vs SBurger-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Pobst / Jackson Freeman vs Galen Howlett / Henrique Perez1-6
W#2 DoublesBlake Jensen / Richard Millard vs John Donahue / Varun Chalasani6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ross / Ra Yasin vs Surya Sampath / Ryan Maloney6-1, 6-1
2025-09-03vs ZRowles-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesVarunkumar Kontamukkala / Adam Williamson vs Chris Reeves / Joseph Williamson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Millard / Blake Jensen vs Zach Rowles / Keith Buckel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ross / David Jackson vs Seth Cowden / John Cowden6-3, 6-1
2025-08-27vs KRamaswamy-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackson Freeman / Austin Council vs Rishi Tandon / Rajeev Bhogadi2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdam Williamson / Dhaval Bajaria vs Shiv Giri / Jeremy Wheelwright2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Franklin / David Jackson vs Nitni Agrawal / Anish Arya2-6, 4-6
2025-08-20vs JMontague-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesJackson Freeman / Jeff Pobst vs Michael Ratliff / Matthew Davies3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Millard / Blake Jensen vs Christopher Rogge / Robert Long6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVarunkumar Kontamukkala / David Jackson vs Stephen Fu / Montgomery Fletcher1-6, 5-7
2025-08-13vs YWon-TOCHLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Franklin / Yung Hung Chang vs Martin Cho / Chan Bae1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJackson Freeman / Jeff Pobst vs Youngjae Won / Woosung Kim6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Millard / Blake Jensen vs Jin Jae Choi / Hyunjun Choi6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KRamaswamy-DUR802316109
2YWon-TOCH7116819170
3JByrd6.5-DUR53141021162
4RYasin-DUR44111330218
5ZRowles-DUR35101429197
6SBurger-DUR2671736242
7CLynch-DUR0842041276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Varunkumar Kontamukkala
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jackson Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Andrew Hedgpeth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.13
Richard Millard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Jeff Pobst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Austin Council
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Yung Hung Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Adam Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Blake Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Ra Yasin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dhaval Bajaria
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Matthew Ross
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Millard + Blake Jensen4158% gamesnot enough data
Jackson Freeman + Jeff Pobst123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Varunkumar Kontamukkala
13W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Jackson Freeman
2W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Franklin
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.22
3
Andrew Hedgpeth
65W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
Richard Millard
10W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
Jeff Pobst
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Austin Council
47W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Yung Hung Chang
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Adam Williamson
13W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Blake Jensen
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Ra Yasin
51W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Dhaval Bajaria
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Ross
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.