Teams

Am.Bauer18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-20vs Ki.Lamb18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesTerri Bartucca / Casey Novak vs Brandi Washington / Randi Wolk6-4, 7-6
2023-06-29vs Ka.Landi18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Talbot / Kay Bonavita vs Ashleigh Black / Katie Landi6-2, 6-1
2023-06-15vs An.Jones18T2.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Blevins / Casey Novak vs Sharon Fadelici / Tracy Grasser2-6, 2-6
2023-06-08vs Pa.Spell18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesKay Bonavita / Casey Novak vs Meghan OFerral / Cathy Lanter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Amanda Bauer
published 3.5
3.17
Carrie Struble
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Mccartney
published 3.5
3.02
Terri Bartucca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Melissa George
published
2.85
Debra Hauge
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Casey Novak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Kelly Talbot
published
2.76
Kay Bonavita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Suzy Kaelin
published
2.57
Kelly Blevins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Bonavita + Terri Bartucca12660% games+5.6% vs expected
Kay Bonavita + Casey Novak10359% gamesnot enough data
Terri Bartucca + Casey Novak10262% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Blevins + Kelly Talbot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Bauer
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carrie Struble
119W–92L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Mccartney
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Terri Bartucca
113W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Casey Novak
114W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Kelly Talbot
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Kay Bonavita
75W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.76
Suzy Kaelin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
2.67
Kelly Blevins
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.