Teams

7 ACAC Eakes

2022 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-27vs 8 Glen Allen SethuramanWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnthony Forgey / Jeff Bosch vs Jeyaraj Jeyasankar / Nanmaran Nallathambi6-4, 6-1
2022-08-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesDarrell Eakes / David Nedeff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-09vs 6 Wyndham Warriors HouffLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Nedeff / Gregory Mitchell vs Keith Harvey / James Driggs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-23vs 8 Glen Allen SethuramanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Gregory Mitchell vs Jeyaraj Jeyasankar / KANNAN VIVEKANANDAN1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-07-09vs 4 Three Chopt Parks DrillersWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Nedeff / Gregory Mitchell vs Vinnie Duong / Nat Draper6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Anthony Forgey
published 4
3.79
Jeff Bosch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
David Nedeff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
3.36
Reginald Tabor
published
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
published
3.27
Craig Carman
published 3.5
3.25
Benjamin Andrews
published 3.5
3.16
Jordan Melland
published
2.78
Chuck W Carter
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Bosch + David Nedeff134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Forgey
33W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Jeff Bosch
205W–177L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
David Nedeff
98W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Reginald Tabor
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Craig Carman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Benjamin Andrews
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Jordan Melland
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Chuck W Carter
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.