Teams

KTAC-Team Bella

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-18vs JTC-Ronning-RebelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesBradford Jensen / Douglas Scott vs James Chan / Daniel Silberman4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoel Conger vs Oscar Grados3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-03-05vs LRC-WilsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesDouglas Scott / Ross Wilson vs Nathan Rettke / Chris Coovert1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJoel Conger vs William Collins4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Fulkerson / Andy Kupp vs Anthony Williamson / Aaron Smith1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth Kidder / Frank Lee vs Randahl Wilson / Ken Enslow6-4, 6-3
2023-02-18vs SWW-TLTC-Kradjan 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDouglas Scott / Craig Fulkerson vs James Schacht / Charles Taylor3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Kidder / Andy Kupp vs Tony Wilkerson / Christopher Bailey1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoseph Bella / Bradford Jensen vs Chris Blaesi / Matt Zehnder1-6, 6-7
2023-02-09vs JTC-Ronning-RebelsLost 13
L#1 DoublesCraig Fulkerson / Kenneth Kidder vs Darran Hanson / Scott Monson1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJoel Conger vs Stephen Hewitt6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesFrank Lee / Joseph Bella vs Oleg Sych / James Chan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Wilson / Ross Wilson vs Daniel Benson / Anthony Suralta1-6, 0-6
2023-01-29vs LRC-WilsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRoss Wilson / Douglas Scott vs Nathan Rettke / George Gonzalez6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoel Conger vs William Collins2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Fulkerson / Joseph Bella vs John Curry / Chris Coovert1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth Kidder / Andy Kupp vs Randahl Wilson / Scott Baird6-3, 6-4
2023-01-21vs JTC-CardwellSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBradford Jensen / Douglas Scott vs Danny Severns / Orlando Montoya1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoel Conger vs Dan Cardwell7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Fulkerson / Kenneth Kidder vs Jim Riley / Greg Gormley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoss Wilson / Keith Wilson vs Tim Hupperten / Kent Gavin6-3, 6-1
2023-01-08vs VAC-Peters-It's Not Our FaultLost 13
L#1 DoublesFrank Lee / Kenneth Kidder vs Mark Dodson / Randy Holmer3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Bella vs David Gano0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Fulkerson / Ross Wilson vs RJ Widrow / Randy Gunderson4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoel Conger / Douglas Scott vs Joseph Shorin / Wes Williams5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-07vs STAC-EarlLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoseph Bella / Douglas Scott vs John Short / David Earl7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Fulkerson / Kenneth Kidder vs Kirk Hill / Barron Willis1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoel Conger / Ross Wilson vs Preston Wallace / James Maxfields4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-TLTC-Kradjan 3.07123922218
2LRC-Wilson71211126247
3JTC-Ronning-Rebels6224820207
4VAC-Peters-It's Not Our Fault44181433267
5STAC-Earl35102248329
6KTAC-Team Bella1782451340
7JTC-Cardwell0882454368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Frank Lee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Joel Conger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
Douglas Scott
published 3
2.73
Kenneth Kidder
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Bradford Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.14
Craig Fulkerson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Andy Kupp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Bella
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Keith Wilson
published
Ross Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Kidder + Craig Fulkerson2445% games−1.0% vs expected
Joseph Bella + Douglas Scott134 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Kidder + Andy Kupp224 matchesnot enough data
Craig Fulkerson + Keith Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Frank Lee
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Joel Conger
42W–53L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Douglas Scott
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kenneth Kidder
22W–58L career · type S · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Bradford Jensen
6W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Craig Fulkerson
27W–66L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Andy Kupp
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Bella
5W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Keith Wilson
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ross Wilson
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.