← Teams

MRoach

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-28vs DFarmer 18+ 4.0Split 1–1
W#2 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs Robert Lockard6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Jared Balcavage7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-07-21Lost 0–1
L#3 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Gordon Paulson0-6, 2-6
2022-07-07vs Smasood 4.0Lost 0–2
L#2 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Saad Masood4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Alpha Asis6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-02vs JByrd-CAP 4.0Lost 0–1
L#3 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Matthew James1-6, 1-6
2022-06-30vs RSheppardLost 0–1
L#2 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Gabriel Iocco1-6, 1-6
2022-06-09vs CMinsleyLost 0–1
L#3 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Charles George4-6, 2-6
2022-06-02vs SWingo7OakSinglesLost 1–2
L#1 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs Jack Baur6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Nick Cox3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesEdward Maginnis vs Pete Padilla6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Brian Hardwick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.44
Edward Maginnis
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.38
Paul Shuey
published —
3.37
Spence Huffstetler
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
—
Michael Ciuffo
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Maginnis + Spence Huffstetler4–448% gamesnot enough data
Brian Hardwick + Spence Huffstetler1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Hardwick
49W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Edward Maginnis
61W–79L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
—
Paul Shuey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
Spence Huffstetler
65W–73L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
—
Michael Ciuffo
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.