Teams

8 Lakeside Club - King 2.5

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-28vs 1 WW Ace Holes - WalekLost 03
L#1 SinglesKeary Shaub vs Jake Bloom2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJoshua Bartels vs Connor Rust1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMark Sperry vs Jon Berger3-6, 0-6
2025-10-20vs 6 Kanawha Crushers - CarpenterLost 03
L#1 SinglesKeary Shaub vs Jonathan Kaufmann0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJon Markham vs Travers Edwards4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJoshua Bartels vs David Carpenter2-6, 1-6
2025-10-13vs 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMark Sperry vs Sam Taylor2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlejandro King vs Andy Campbell4-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesKeary Shaub vs Mark Cullip6-1, 6-0
2025-10-08vs 2 SCC Tri Lambs - PercyLost 12
W#1 SinglesKeary Shaub vs John Troy Owens6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlejandro King vs Ryan Nagle4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMark Sperry vs David Percy4-6, 1-6
2025-09-29vs 7 ACAC - RhodesLost 12
L#1 SinglesAlejandro King vs Bennett Lee2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKeary Shaub vs Parker Ward7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJoshua Bartels vs James Croke0-6, 3-6
2025-09-22vs 5 Westwood Wiz - WisotzkiLost 03
L#1 SinglesKeary Shaub vs Patrick Regan3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJon Markham vs Gordon Wisotzki2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJoshua Bartels vs Patrick Lloyd4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Keary Shaub
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.29
Alejandro King
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Garrett Shifflett
published
2.07
Joshua Bartels
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.04
Jon Markham
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mark Sperry
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandro King + Keary Shaub5357% games+15.8% vs expected
Jon Markham + Joshua Bartels0536% games−5.5% vs expected
Garrett Shifflett + Mark Sperry213 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro King + Joshua Bartels033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keary Shaub
14W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Alejandro King
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Garrett Shifflett
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Joshua Bartels
1W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jon Markham
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Mark Sperry
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.