Teams

Ca.Conzola55T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 55 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.23 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-21vs Ta.LeFevre55TWon 20
W#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Jane Hunter vs Tara LeFevre / Takako Schenberger6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Carolyn Elliott vs Carol Zimmerman / Kathleen Serow6-4, 7-5
2023-07-20vs Be.Kelly55TSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMelissa Hill / Marina Barthalmus vs Lorrie Hareza / Stephanie Lee6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMyra Peterson / Jorgelina Stroud vs Kati Ray / Pamela Schoenfeld2-6, 3-6
2023-07-13vs Le.Magee55TLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Kempf / Karen Thurston vs Sarah Mulligan / Fran Ange4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Melissa Hill vs Lynn Trefzger / Sarah Schmalz2-6, 3-6
2023-06-30vs Le.Magee55TLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebi Collins / Karen Thurston vs Leigh Magee / Lynne Manweiler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Lisa Kempf vs Heidi Duggins / Maureen Nixon7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Elliott / Suzanne Ruggles vs Joy Cooper / Peggy Williams5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-29vs Be.Kelly55TWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebi Collins / Karen Thurston vs Sara Wilhelmy / Kellie Snider4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Marina Barthalmus vs Toni Paladino / Stephanie Lee6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Jorgelina Stroud vs Kati Ray / Pamela Schoenfeld3-6, 3-6
2023-06-15vs Ta.LeFevre55TLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Lisa Kempf vs Andrea McCartney / Diane Werner4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Marina Barthalmus vs Martha Funsten / Deb Lanier2-6, 1-6
2023-06-08vs Be.Kelly55TWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebi Collins / Heidi Sloan vs Bernice Simmons / Kellie Snider4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Lisa Kempf vs Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall / Fiona Patterson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMyra Peterson / Jorgelina Stroud vs Stephanie Lee / Pamela Schoenfeld1-6, 1-6
2023-06-01vs Le.Magee55TLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Kempf / Jane Hunter vs Sarah Mulligan / Fran Ange2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Melissa Hill vs Lynn Trefzger / Maureen Nixon4-6, 1-6
2023-05-25vs Ta.LeFevre55TWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebi Collins / Heidi Sloan vs Andrea McCartney / Deb Skiko3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCamille Conzola / Jane Hunter vs Gwen Noble / Takako Schenberger6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Fulcher / Myra Peterson vs Kathleen Serow / Frederica Shipman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jane Hunter
published
3.39
Lisa Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Camille Conzola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Evelyn Andino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Heidi Sloan
published 3.5
2.96
Debi Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Betsy Fulcher
published 3
2.83
Myra Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Carolyn Elliott
published 3
2.63
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jorgelina Stroud + Suzanne Ruggles181850% games+8.6% vs expected
Camille Conzola + Lisa Kempf6552% games−0.8% vs expected
Myra Peterson + Lisa Kempf183047% games−3.5% vs expected
Evelyn Andino + Camille Conzola5650% games−3.9% vs expected
Lisa Kempf + Marina Barthalmus4647% games−5.5% vs expected
Myra Peterson + Suzanne Ruggles7448% games−8.0% vs expected
Suzanne Ruggles + Marina Barthalmus5549% gamesnot enough data
Evelyn Andino + Marina Barthalmus2640% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Hunter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Lisa Kempf
367W–302L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Camille Conzola
258W–178L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Evelyn Andino
67W–150L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Heidi Sloan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Debi Collins
48W–114L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Suzanne Ruggles
184W–162L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Betsy Fulcher
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Myra Peterson
170W–141L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Carolyn Elliott
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.