Teams

ICC - Mathis

2026 B'ham Spring - Mixed 40 & Over Sunday 3:45 pm · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-14vs CCB - Hall/CaseLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Rudder / Robert Rudder vs Mary Bell / Richard Reynolds7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandon Mathis / Rebecca Mathis vs Caroline Clark / George Holman5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Hodo / Joe Parham vs Chip Hall / Caroline Hall6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs PRC - Mattox/MaddoxLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrandon Mathis / Rebecca Mathis vs Ouida Boykin / Jeff Hammack6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrad Sandidge / Rebecca Sandidge vs Aimee Sims / Terry Sims3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLauri Derecki / Richard Derecki vs Charlyne Mattox / Donovan Pieper1-6
W#1 DoublesBrandon Mathis / Rebecca Mathis vs Charlene Linson / Donald Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Hodo / Joe Parham vs Angela Rembert / Eric Harris2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Rudder / Robert Rudder vs Miranda ONeal / Edward Bradford2-6, 3-6
2026-04-26vs BH - ManeiceLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Rudder / Robert Rudder vs Dawn Bastarache / Chris Fields2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Mathis / Brandon Mathis vs Donna Maneice / Ronnie McFarling4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauri Derecki / Richard Derecki vs Angela Cochis / Tray Ivey1-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs PRC - Kennedy/BaggettWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrandon Mathis / Rebecca Mathis vs Byron Eaton / Leslie Edwards7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Derecki / Lauri Derecki vs Joseph Osborn / Jennifer Cooke4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChad Beasley / Jennifer Beasley vs Bradley Wilkins / Michelle Davenport6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Old Overton - HigginsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrandon Mathis / Rebecca Mathis vs Jared Cox / Margaret Cox6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChad Beasley / Jennifer Beasley vs Lana Shoultz / Brady Hughes0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Sandidge / Brad Sandidge vs Aria Higgins / Marcus Higgins2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Rebecca Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Rebecca Sandidge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Andrea Rudder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Robert Rudder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Lauri Derecki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Joe Parham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Brandon Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Richard Derecki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Brad Sandidge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Chad Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Cindy Hodo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Mathis + Brandon Mathis7356% games+3.9% vs expected
Rebecca Sandidge + Brad Sandidge2639% games+1.4% vs expected
Lauri Derecki + Richard Derecki1730% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Rudder + Robert Rudder1540% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Mathis
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Rebecca Sandidge
22W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Rudder
38W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
Robert Rudder
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Lauri Derecki
20W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Joe Parham
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Brandon Mathis
21W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Richard Derecki
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brad Sandidge
24W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Chad Beasley
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Cindy Hodo
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.