Teams

Ba.Yusuf18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-13vs Sh.Roberts18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Fu / Zachary Hopp vs Hunter Ryno / Liam O'Boyle6-3, 6-1
2024-05-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesEduardo Schlotterhausen / Louis Crow vs Willi Hayes / Chris Smith6-1, 6-1
2024-04-28vs Ev.Fultz18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Nenon / Louis Crow vs Luo Xiao / James Wu3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFrederick Holding / James Mellott vs Steve Crell / Brian Ross6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Mellott / Frederick Holding vs Larry Moye / Paul Sullivan6-3, 6-3
2024-04-07vs Er.Moritz18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesFrederick Holding / Eduardo Schlotterhausen vs James Coblentz / Jeff Abercrombie6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesZachary Hopp / Jason Fu vs Eric Moritz / Gregory Beyer6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKen Glanville / Louis Crow vs Christopher Bricker / Rahul Arora6-3, 6-2
2024-03-17vs La.Williams18AWon 20
W#2 DoublesFrederick Holding / Youngjun Lee vs Nick Strope / Jason Widen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Mellott / Louis Crow vs Bobby Hammond / McLean Warren6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-03vs Br.Lamm18AWon 10
W#3 DoublesZachary Hopp / Jason Fu vs Jeff Keisner / Brent Lamm6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Youngjun Lee
published
3.79
David Nenon
published 4
3.72
Benjamin Katz
published 4
3.66
Conner Garrison
published 4
3.63
3.48
Zachary Hopp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Ken Glanville
published
3.36
Frederick Holding
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Louis Crow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Mason Dye
published
3.10
James Mellott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Crow + Ken Glanville4351% games+0.5% vs expected
Louis Crow + Zachary Hopp2643% games−4.0% vs expected
Frederick Holding + Zachary Hopp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Youngjun Lee
31W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
David Nenon
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Benjamin Katz
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Conner Garrison
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Eduardo Schlotterhausen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Zachary Hopp
56W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Ken Glanville
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Frederick Holding
120W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Louis Crow
49W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Mason Dye
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
James Mellott
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.