Teams

BTC:Serve-vivors

Summer Social Flex League · Women's 7.0 Summer Flex

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-16vs BTC:Alley Cats:FonsecaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeggy Cohen / Lori Durieux vs Rebecca Stevens / Giao Dang8-9
W#2 DoublesMartha Edelson / Alana Lowry vs Mary Kirkpatrick / Susan Snider8-3
2026-08-09vs BTC:Game, Set, Laugh:WimbleLost 01
L#1 DoublesMartha Edelson / Peggy Cohen vs Arlene Abadi / Edye Graning3-8
2026-08-02vs BTC:Alley Cats:FonsecaWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlana Lowry / Lori Roberts vs Mina Smith / Giao Dang8-6
W#2 DoublesPeggy Cohen / Martha Edelson vs Susan Snider / Mary Kirkpatrick8-6
2026-07-19vs BTC:Hit For Brains:WeissLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeggy Cohen / Natalie Neuert vs Laura Williams / Vivianne Ivanier4-8
L#2 DoublesKathryn Ruwet / Alana Lowry vs Kristin Walsh / Kate Cunningham3-3
2026-07-12vs BTC:Game, Set, Laugh:WimbleLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Martha Edelson vs Judith Wimble / Gini Park7-9
L#2 DoublesLori Durieux / Alana Lowry vs Megan Shrestha / Edye Graning6-8
2026-07-12vs BTC:Hit For Brains:WeissSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Martha Edelson vs Jennifer Weiss / Megan OBrien4-8
W#2 DoublesPeggy Cohen / Kathryn Ruwet vs Laura Williams / Kristin Walsh8-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women's 7.0 Summer Flex
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Game, Set, Laugh:Wimble51102248
2BTC:Serve-vivors4257776
3BTC:Hit For Brains:Weiss3384456
4BTC:Alley Cats:Fonseca061111197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Alana Lowry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Peggy Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Martha Edelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Lori Durieux
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Kathryn Ruwet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Neuert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Neuert + Peggy Cohen6456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alana Lowry
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Peggy Cohen
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Martha Edelson
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Lori Durieux
37W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Kathryn Ruwet
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Natalie Neuert
27W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.