Teams

LBible-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-25vs LKulp-SVCWon 21
W#1 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Allison Stewart-Smull6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRagini Singh vs Jennifer Magee6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Ashlyn Zebrowski4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-18vs KGreen-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Keshia Green6-2, 7-6
2025-06-04vs GLoFrese-ENOWon 10
W#3 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Juliana Maul6-1, 6-4
2025-05-28vs LKulp-SVCLost 02
L#2 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Melissa Coward1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Katie Naftel1-6, 0-6
2025-05-25vs KGreen-ENOSplit 11
L#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Amber Bowden6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Keshia Green3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-21vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Kim McWhorter6-3, 7-5
2025-05-07vs MLong-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Kathryn Howington6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Ekaterina Seregina
published
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Ragini Singh
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Addie Eckles
published 3.5
3.04
Wilton Burns
published
3.01
Lindsay Mize
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Julia Haslett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralie Bible + Lindsay Mize10269% games+14.8% vs expected
Ragini Singh + Julia Haslett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ekaterina Seregina
23W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Ragini Singh
94W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Addie Eckles
4W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Wilton Burns
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Lindsay Mize
111W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Julia Haslett
47W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.