Teams

DLT

2022 18&Over Men · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-14vs Hudson AcesWon 32
L#1 DoublesInJae Hwang / Joseph Kim vs Kevin Duong / Ryan Convery2-4
W#1 SinglesTaeyoung Yoon vs Debasish Chakraborty4-6, 5-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSehoon Chang / Namsuk Kim vs Paul Bressi / Edgar Cala6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHAN JU LEE vs Nirav Vasa6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRommel Ruby / Hoon Park vs Arjun Jauhari / Neil Labay6-0, 6-4
2022-06-30vs Guts and GloryWon 32
W#1 DoublesRommel Ruby / Hoon Park vs Joseph Mendez / Donald Thompson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKevin Uhm vs Oladipo Alao3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesYoungsok Kim / Joseph Kim vs Andrew Friedman / Enrique Sangama6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesInJae Hwang vs Joshua Shimpfky6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNamsuk Kim / Jiyoung Lee vs Alex Mogilevskiy / Richard Shirley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-23vs Wehrle/NadalLost 23
L#1 DoublesRommel Ruby / Hoon Park vs Ralph Nadal / Scott Leiman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKevin Uhm vs John Yoon Kim6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesInJae Hwang / Sehoon Chang vs Paul Park / Andrew Appell7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTaeyoung Yoon vs Kishore Chandrasekharan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJiyoung Lee / Namsuk Kim vs Joshua Peters / Clint Tomlinson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-16vs Mid Court CrisisLost 23
L#1 DoublesRommel Ruby / Hoon Park vs Will Coston / Mikhail Prilutskiy4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesYoungsok Kim vs Jonathan Ordonez7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kim / Kevin Uhm vs Christian Essner / Jorge Lam6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesSu Park vs Fabio Penaloza Ortegon4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJiyoung Lee / Taeyoung Yoon vs Paul Labay / Srba Nikolic6-0, 6-1
2022-06-09vs RocktenWon 32
L#1 DoublesKevin Uhm / Youngsok Kim vs Sunil Sah / Preet Hooda2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesHAN JU LEE vs Milan Pathak6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoseph Kim / Jiyoung Lee vs Rajiv Rohilla / Jasjit Singh1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSu Park vs Paryush Lakhtaria6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNamsuk Kim / Taeyoung Yoon vs ARUN SHARMA / Pradeep Asok3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-02vs Bergen BashersLost 14
L#1 DoublesKevin Uhm / Youngsok Kim vs Jonathan Glassman / Marc Rothenberg6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHAN JU LEE vs Miguel Merida- Nicolich5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSehoon Chang / Rommel Ruby vs Aaron Daubert-Terrigno / Todd Allievi6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTaeyoung Yoon vs Brian Kruse1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHoon Park / Su Park vs Nik Bafana / John Carlin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bergen Bashers0621924227
2Wehrle/Nadal06191129261
3Mid Court Crisis06151535269
4Rockten06131738276
5DLT06141638273
6Guts and Glory06111941285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

HAN JU LEE
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
InJae Hwang
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jiyoung Lee
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Joseph Kim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Keun Ok
published
Kevin Uhm
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Namsuk Kim
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rommel Ruby
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sehoon Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Su Park
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Taeyoung Yoon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Youngsok Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Su Park + InJae Hwang4153% games+9.5% vs expected
Rommel Ruby + Sehoon Chang134 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Kim + Kevin Uhm224 matchesnot enough data
Youngsok Kim + Joseph Kim213 matchesnot enough data
Youngsok Kim + Kevin Uhm123 matchesnot enough data
InJae Hwang + Kevin Uhm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
HAN JU LEE
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
InJae Hwang
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jiyoung Lee
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Kim
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keun Ok
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Uhm
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Namsuk Kim
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rommel Ruby
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sehoon Chang
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Su Park
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Taeyoung Yoon
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Youngsok Kim
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.