Teams

HCC Causing A Racquet - A. Flinter

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-13vs Davis Island - J. MaxwellWon 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Martinez / Marcia Deuerling vs Joan Gonzalez / Jaime Patterson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-06vs Hills - Palma Ceia/PaglieriSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJamie Lutich / Thuy Duong vs Sadaf Eckermann / Nancy Coughlin6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnh Flinter / Cynthia Martinez vs Stacy Hausinger / Pam Pitisci3-6, 4-6
2022-04-29vs Harbour Island - S. WilsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesJackie Caouette / Cynthia Martinez vs Stephanie Wilson / Christel Yaffe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-22vs Apollo Beach - L. GreenleeLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Odum / Cynthia Martinez vs Debra Bell / Rene Kenyon4-6, 4-6
2022-04-15vs RiverHills - A. PicheWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Clem / Thuy Duong vs Angela Piche / Catheleine Rossborough6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKim Fernald / Cynthia Martinez vs Tonya Keels / Allison Townsend5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoann Suyao / Prin Vasseur vs Brigitte Paola / Frances Swartz7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abbe Malone
published 4.5
4.11
Jamie Lutich
published 4
4.05
Melanie Clem
published
3.99
Kim Fernald
published
3.86
Cynthia Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
3.69
Thuy Duong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Joann Suyao
published
3.59
Prin Vasseur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Marcia Deuerling
published
3.44
Mary Odum
published
3.29
Anh Flinter
published 3.5
Jaclyn Turner
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abbe Malone
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jamie Lutich
115W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
4.11
Melanie Clem
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
Kim Fernald
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Cynthia Martinez
186W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Thuy Duong
67W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.69
Joann Suyao
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Prin Vasseur
126W–155L career · 1 line in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Marcia Deuerling
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Mary Odum
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Anh Flinter
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Jaclyn Turner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.