Teams

SD 4.0 Coronado Cays/ Hammond (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer - SD · SD - Women - WD 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-06vs SD 4.0 Mtn View / McLellan (2/2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheryl Munning / Lin Sherman vs Rosie Wagner / Bea Vega6-4, 6-1
2021-07-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesElsie Hammond / Diana Meskimen vs Barbara Roorda / Jennifer Knock6-7, 3-6
2021-07-09vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Stow (2/2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Lehr / Lin Sherman vs Roselynn Brown / Annie Chambers0-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-06-25vs SD 4.0 LJB&TC/ Patterson (2/2)Split 11
W#2 DoublesJill Lehr / Elsie Hammond vs Elouise Potomac / Karen Flynn6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Borunda / Lin Sherman vs Jennifer Greenfield / Jessica Rogge5-7, 2-6
2021-06-24vs SD LLW 4.0 LJTC/ BourneLost 01
L#3 DoublesTeresa Bear / Elsie Hammond vs Christine Golemb / Janene Christopher1-6, 3-6
2021-06-18vs SD 4.0 Mtn View / McLellan (2/2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Bear / Elsie Hammond vs Emi Kanayama / Chigusa Okubo6-7, 4-6
2021-06-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesElsie Hammond / Michele Borunda vs Cathy Swindlehurst / Briana Ruff6-3, 6-2
2021-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesLin Sherman / Linda la Terza vs Lili Oteiza / Michelle Avila6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Linda la Terza
published 4
3.74
Lin Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
3.68
Jill Webster
published
3.55
Sheryl Munning
published 4
3.47
Teresa Bear
published 4
3.43
Elsie Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Tugce Varol
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsie Hammond + Tugce Varol92641% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda la Terza
121W–58L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Lin Sherman
34W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cristina Rassvetaieff
75W–61L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Jill Webster
15W–21L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Sheryl Munning
40W–53L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Teresa Bear
87W–45L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Elsie Hammond
66W–161L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Tugce Varol
56W–91L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.