Teams

Tennis Villains/Lee/Danville

2024 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-11vs Iron Monkey/He/Palo AltoWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Greer / Steve Meyer vs Chuo-Yun Yang / Andy Cheng6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHenry Liu / Scott Takishita vs Paul Kwon / Peng Qu3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDimitry Goldshteyn / Rishi Sharma vs Yaohui Chen / Liwei Zhou6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSridhar Balasubramanian / Amal Radia vs Jimmy Le / Muralidharan Jayavelan6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSaurabh Shrivastava / Jingjun JJ Cao vs Nathan Michael Mertz / Sundar Thirumalai4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndy Lee / Ryan Dacayanan vs Sivakumar Manickavasagam / Venkatesan Chandran2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Robert Greer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Amal Radia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Steve Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Sridhar Balasubramanian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Henry Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Dimitry Goldshteyn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Scott Takishita
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Rishi Sharma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Jimmy Agustin
published 3
2.90
Ryan Dacayanan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Andy Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jingjun JJ Cao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Meyer + Robert Greer3452% games+3.6% vs expected
Sridhar Balasubramanian + Amal Radia224 matchesnot enough data
Rishi Sharma + Ryan Dacayanan033 matchesnot enough data
Henry Liu + Dimitry Goldshteyn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Greer
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Amal Radia
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Steve Meyer
12W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Sridhar Balasubramanian
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Henry Liu
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Dimitry Goldshteyn
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.41
Scott Takishita
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Rishi Sharma
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Jimmy Agustin
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Dacayanan
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Andy Lee
6W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Jingjun JJ Cao
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.