Teams

Breakers

2025 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-24vs Cedar SprintLost 12
L#1 SinglesNick Fox vs Riley Huffer2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChiraag Bains vs Andrew Maddocks6-7, 3-3
W#3 SinglesMarvin Martinez vs Kenta Goto6-3, 7-6
2025-08-23vs DJ KittenLost 02
L#1 SinglesDaniel Mamani vs Bobby Shore1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChiraag Bains vs William Doan4-6, 2-2
2025-07-27vs Cedar SprintLost 02
L#1 SinglesMarvin Martinez vs Brad Ziajor2-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesNick Fox vs Kenta Goto0-6, 2-6
2025-07-20vs DJ KittenWon 30
W#1 SinglesDaniel Mamani vs Zachary Sousa6-1, 3-4
W#2 SinglesMarvin Martinez vs Shane Callaghan6-3, 2-2
W#3 SinglesChiraag Bains vs Bradley Kesling6-4, 4-1
2025-07-19vs The Break PointersLost 12
W#1 SinglesMarvin Martinez vs Shawn Arita6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNick Fox vs David Kidwell Slak2-6, 3-1
L#3 SinglesJerome Lebleu vs Ronald Chan1-6, 4-6
2025-07-12vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#1 SinglesMarvin Martinez vs Mike Hill Jr5-7, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Daniel Mamani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Marvin Martinez
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.64
Chiraag Bains
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Bryan Bassig
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.43
Nick Fox
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Justin Romano
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Eric Wachter
published 3.5
Jerome Lebleu
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Romano + Eric Wachter2356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Mamani
20W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Marvin Martinez
21W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Chiraag Bains
18W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Bryan Bassig
143W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
Nick Fox
19W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Justin Romano
91W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Eric Wachter
52W–59L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Jerome Lebleu
5W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.