Teams

GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Michnovicz/NMSU

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings5 teams · 2025 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Roacho/55&over/7.0MX62141023217
2GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Michnovicz/NMSU5316820204
3GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Burns/FB53141022187
4GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Ninkovich/TW35111329213
5GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Daw/EPCC1751941273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
David Coyle
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.88
Andrew Michnovicz
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Gail Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Greg Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Jennifer Bush
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
John Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Kerry Lore
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Oren Belkin
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Sintra Sampath
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Stephanie Beckles
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Thomas Lore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Victor Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Lore + Sintra Sampath13557% gamesnot enough data
Esther Orona + Stephanie Beckles8456% gamesnot enough data
Victor Ruiz + Linda Rowse9066% gamesnot enough data
Linda Rowse + Sintra Sampath7069% gamesnot enough data
Sintra Sampath + John Trujillo4356% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Bush + David Coyle5158% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Lore + Kerry Lore314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Michnovicz + Oren Belkin314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Coyle
27W–23L career · 11 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Andrew Michnovicz
108W–70L career · 34 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Esther Orona
123W–106L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gail Richardson
31W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Garcia
32W–51L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Bush
71W–79L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Trujillo
36W–27L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Lore
83W–74L career · 42 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lia Shelton
141W–90L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oren Belkin
46W–44L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sintra Sampath
74W–34L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Beckles
69W–60L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Lore
61W–74L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victor Ruiz
34W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.