Teams

Team 13 Sassy Smashers

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-14vs Team 2 CarvajalLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Leary / Indre Conners vs Wendy Carvajal / Heather Toombs3-6, 1-6
2024-04-06vs Team 8 Grace's AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Kane / Kathleen Leary vs Sharon Tompkins / Blair Reid3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-19vs Team 1 Lady BallersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Kane / Jayne Deckwitz vs June Wheatley / Laura Kenney0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Bellamy / Irena Bucci vs Andrea Gevas / Elizabeth Solander1-6, 2-6
2024-03-17vs Team 7 Top SpinnersLost 01
L#2 DoublesIndre Conners / Irena Bucci vs Cathy Huh / Marcia Pokrant1-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs Team 10 Over Served 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Leary / Irena Bucci vs Mary Berkowitz / Kate Putt7-6, 0-1
2024-02-17vs Team 14 Wasabi PeasLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Hahn / Jayne Deckwitz vs Olena Danylova / Roxana Schwenk4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-01-21vs Team 4 Serve Me A Double 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesIrena Bucci / Wendy Hahn vs Katie Pegoraro / Alisha Kim1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Leary / Julie Zalkind vs Danielle Frazier / Suzanne Pitkin4-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Wendy Hahn
published
3.52
Josephine Cooper
published
3.50
Jayne Deckwitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Irena Bucci
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Kathleen Leary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Elizabeth Clarke
published
2.96
Indre Conners
published
Julie Zalkind
published
Valerie Stoehr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irena Bucci + Kathleen Leary4450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Hahn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Jayne Deckwitz
74W–98L career · 2 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Irena Bucci
97W–125L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kathleen Leary
160W–190L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Elizabeth Clarke
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
Julie Zalkind
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Stoehr
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.