Teams

McCalla/Memphis

2024 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 4.5 Mixed 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-28vs Jackson/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTu Pham / Shannon McCalla vs Meredith Haselwood / Joe Johnson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHamed Yessoufou / Kimberly Cox vs Kenneth Russell / Emily Brown7-5, 6-3
2024-07-24vs Jackson/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDana Bray / John Foust vs Timothy Myrick / Carley Myrick7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Tull / Kimberly Cox vs Aimee Gregg / Matthew Gregg7-6, 6-3
2024-06-30vs Jackson/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesHamed Yessoufou / Wang-Ying Glasgow vs Meredith Haselwood / Kenneth Russell6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Johnston Tayloe / John Foust vs Aimee Gregg / John Watson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Hagerman / Shannon McCalla vs Stephanie Longsworth / Nick Longsworth5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-16vs Jackson/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesTu Pham / Dana Bray vs Timothy Myrick / Carley Myrick6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Butorac / Allison Musick vs Santiago Arbelaez / Aimee Gregg1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Foust / Kimberly Cox vs Joe Johnson / Carmen Lewis6-2, 6-3
2024-06-09vs Jackson/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesHamed Yessoufou / Wang-Ying Glasgow vs Joe Johnson / Stephanie Longsworth6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Butorac / Allison Musick vs Tristan Jackson / Carmen Lewis6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Tull / Dana Bray vs Timothy Myrick / Carley Myrick4-6, 1-6
2024-06-02vs Jackson/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Hagerman / Kimberly Cox vs Meredith Haselwood / Tristan Jackson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Foust / Mary Johnston Tayloe vs Aimee Gregg / Matthew Gregg6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTu Pham / Wang-Ying Glasgow vs Stephanie Longsworth / Nick Longsworth1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCalla/Memphis5113513138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Hamed Yessoufou
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Benjamin Tull
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Mary Johnston Tayloe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Dana Bray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Wang-Ying Glasgow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
John Foust
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.01
Shannon McCalla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Allison Musick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
John Butorac
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Hagerman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tu Pham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Musick + John Butorac3347% games−12.8% vs expected
Shannon McCalla + Paul Hagerman4160% gamesnot enough data
Wang-Ying Glasgow + Hamed Yessoufou5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hamed Yessoufou
25W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Benjamin Tull
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Johnston Tayloe
45W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Dana Bray
40W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
Wang-Ying Glasgow
46W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
John Foust
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
Shannon McCalla
39W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Allison Musick
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.00
John Butorac
24W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
Paul Hagerman
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tu Pham
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.