Teams

Fairbanks 4.0

2025 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-01vs Wangstas 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Yiziying Chen3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Motley / Alison Serino vs Evelyn Chan / Corinne Chau1-6, 1-6
2025-05-29vs Rubino 4.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Jessica Somers6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShalen Fairbanks / Meaghan McHugh vs Nicola Goren / Michelle Stas4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Motley / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Paru Rellan / Rebecca Hammond0-6, 0-6
2025-05-20vs Ball Busters 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Motley / Alison Serino vs Christine Bragale / June Chung4-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs Happy Feet 4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Robin Burton vs Karen Jones / Julie Edwards6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Kim / Tana Jankowiak vs Tricia Muneses / Andrea Burkert6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Hazel / Darcie Hammer vs Cintya Leveque / Sanghee Lee6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-10vs break a string 18+ 4.0Won 31
W#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Katie Tetrault6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Alison Serino vs Ruxandra Badiu / Carmen Scurato0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Kim Atkinson6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKim Hazel / Meglyn Lansing vs Regina Farrington / Kathryn Williams6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-07vs Wangstas 4.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesKim Chamberlain / Erin Kim vs Jessica Lee / Shan Wang6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Yiziying Chen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Richards / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Kristina Leary / Stephanie Pitts1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTana Jankowiak / Darcie Hammer vs Kerry Spicer / Kirah Yen4-6, 3-6
2025-05-03vs Rubino 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Eberhart / Janet Opar vs Carolyn Greis / Dawn Yules1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Burton / Meaghan McHugh vs Zoie Acadia / Janet Wu7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Natilee Festa2-6, 0-6
2025-04-27vs Ball Busters 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Hazel / Tana Jankowiak vs Laura Henmueller / Terry Cocozza1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs Happy Feet 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Chamberlain / Erin Kim vs Carrie McIntyre / Martha Nolan2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Opar / Robin Burton vs Yunden Jinsmaa / Anto Faini1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Motley / Tana Jankowiak vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Cathy Robertson5-7, 3-6
2025-04-12vs break a string 18+ 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Richards / Kim Chamberlain vs Evelien Josselin / Kathy Crowley5-7, 0-2
W#2 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Janet Opar vs Sharon Cassidy / Regina Farrington6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Meaghan McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Alexis McCary
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kimberlee Overdeck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Robin Burton
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 4
3.54
Kim Chamberlain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.47
Shalen Fairbanks
published
3.31
Janet Opar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Katya Vert-Wong
published
Andrea Motley
published 3.5
3.19
Meglyn Lansing
published
3.17
Darcie Hammer
published 3.5
2.99
Kim Hazel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Opar + Alison Serino2337% gamesnot enough data
Janet Opar + Kim Chamberlain1436% gamesnot enough data
Kim Chamberlain + Tana Jankowiak123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meaghan McHugh
115W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Alexis McCary
143W–108L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Robin Burton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Tana Jankowiak
96W–69L career · 13 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Kim Chamberlain
139W–119L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Shalen Fairbanks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Janet Opar
71W–154L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Katya Vert-Wong
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Motley
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meglyn Lansing
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Darcie Hammer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Kim Hazel
98W–117L career · 7 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.