Teams

Serve It Up

2025 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-18vs The NETWorkWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Matlock / Bill Keating vs Charles Schmoyer / Wade Sutton6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard McKeon / Stephen Siegel vs Thomas Maddux / Brandon Camille0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / John Doe vs William Bryan / Eric Ritz6-2, 6-2
2025-05-18vs PINEY RUNWon 10
W#1 DoublesBill Keating / Majed Hamawy vs Jermaine Leonard / Derrick Lykins6-4, 4-2
2025-05-17vs 3.0 TerminettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard McKeon / Bill Keating vs Taion Walters / Bryan Daguiar3-6, 1-4
2025-04-18vs PINEY RUNSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Jose Toro vs Lycurtis Wortham / Mark Hill6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard McKeon / Raymond Barry vs Sidney Williams / Derrick Lykins4-6, 5-3
2025-04-13vs The NETWorkLost 02
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Chris Matlock vs Eric Ritz / Nathaniel Martineau4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Barry / Stephen Siegel vs William Bryan / Wade Sutton1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Majed Hamawy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Matt Wilke
published
2.93
Bill Keating
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
published
Chris Matlock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Daren Bakst
published 3
2.63
Richard McKeon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Levine
published
Stephen Siegel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Jose Toro2344% games−3.9% vs expected
Peter Levine + Richard McKeon1533% games−19.4% vs expected
Majed Hamawy + Richard McKeon3643% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Majed Hamawy
379W–516L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Matt Wilke
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Chris Matlock
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Daren Bakst
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Raymond Barry
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Peter Levine
9W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Siegel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.