Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2022 Tri-Level 55 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tammy Jirjis
published
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.67
Loralie Liggett
published
3.62
Maura Fitzgerald
published
3.59
Melissa Geno
published
3.56
Jan Phanthalangsy
published
3.42
Marie Hope Kirkland
published
3.35
Susan Manley
published
3.33
Jacqueline King
published 3.5
3.31
Linda Payne
published
3.25
Laurie Passmore
published
3.22
Mary Carkhuff
published
3.21
Laura Murak
published
3.07
Kerri Frye
published
3.05
Lesly Todesco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesly Todesco + Susan Manley5841% games−5.5% vs expected
Kerri Frye + Susan Manley1445% games−12.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Jirjis
23W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Loralie Liggett
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Maura Fitzgerald
24W–22L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Melissa Geno
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jan Phanthalangsy
24W–32L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Marie Hope Kirkland
16W–27L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
Susan Manley
42W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Jacqueline King
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Linda Payne
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Laurie Passmore
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.25
Mary Carkhuff
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Laura Murak
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Kerri Frye
10W–27L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lesly Todesco
19W–34L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.