Teams

PRC - Wilson 18+ Tri-Level

2025 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-23vs BH - Lacey/BinghamLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Burke / Anne Long vs Calli Robinson / Lindsay Hugghins0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Brown / Belinda Hale vs Rebecca Sheffer / Courtney Grill7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMiki Wilson / Lindsey Fehr vs Erin Godwin / Lauren Calagaz1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAnne Long / Leslie Edwards vs Brandi Israel / Laura Lee Charles4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Hart / Belinda Hale vs Breanna Young / Sarah Kay Wos6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Cooke / Stephanie Panagiotides vs Lindsey Lutz / Morgan Choat4-6, 3-6
2025-06-02vs Hoover Met - Bradley/MeredithLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Burke / Elizabeth Daly vs Leah Taylor / April Wittmann3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMiki Wilson / Leslie Edwards vs Kyndall Spooner Robbins / Jennet Jumayeva2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBillie Caine / Lindsey Fehr vs Courtney Taylor / Bethany Bertovic1-6, 2-6
2025-05-20vs Inverness CC - McClanahanLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Long / Jamie Burke vs Ashley Wood / Melinda Claudepierre4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Hart / Leslie Edwards vs Lauren Kozlowski / Bonnie Johnson7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBillie Caine / Jennifer Cooke vs Kelly Ray / Tracy Tracy4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Liana Byrd
published
3.59
Elizabeth Daly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jamie Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Meg Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Belinda Hale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Anna Hart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Leslie Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Meghan Griffith
published
3.06
Jennifer Cooke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Stephanie Panagiotides
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Billie Caine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Lindsey Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Miki Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Edwards + Anna Hart2549% games+4.4% vs expected
Jennifer Cooke + Billie Caine5456% games+3.3% vs expected
Belinda Hale + Anna Hart3352% games+2.2% vs expected
Belinda Hale + Leslie Edwards2349% games−1.3% vs expected
Leslie Edwards + Jennifer Cooke51044% games−4.1% vs expected
Leslie Edwards + Stephanie Panagiotides134 matchesnot enough data
Meg Brown + Lindsey Fehr303 matchesnot enough data
Meg Brown + Meghan Griffith033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liana Byrd
61W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
Elizabeth Daly
41W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jamie Burke
26W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Meg Brown
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Belinda Hale
17W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Anna Hart
33W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Leslie Edwards
38W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Meghan Griffith
3W–17L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Cooke
39W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Stephanie Panagiotides
53W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Billie Caine
38W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Lindsey Fehr
21W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Miki Wilson
6W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.