Teams

Forest Lakes

2022 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-13Lost 01
L#2 SinglesShauna Hogg vs Sarah Caldwell0-6, 3-6
2022-06-08vs BHS - McCullochLost 01
L#2 DoublesDenika Gum / Lynette Sanford vs Courtney Heyward / Susan McConnell1-6, 0-6
2022-05-25vs BHSC - Hoover/HapgoodLost 02
L#2 SinglesLynette Sanford vs Anita McGinty3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShauna Hogg / Susan Peck vs Jeanne Ward / Abbie Oliver2-6, 3-6
2022-05-18vs KeswickLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Kohler / Shauna Hogg vs Susan Cabell Mains / Donna Horn1-6, 1-6
2022-05-04vs BHS - McCullochLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Julie McCulloch / Susan McConnell1-6, 1-6
2022-04-29vs ACAC - Crooked RacquetsSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLynette Sanford vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesShauna Hogg / Beth Kohler vs Carol Almas / Patricia Foley3-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs BHSC - Hoover/HapgoodLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Susan Wall vs Silvia Blemker / Taylor Kelley3-6, 6-7
2022-04-20vs KeswickLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Wall / Lynette Sanford vs Amelia Black / Donna Horn4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Stephanie Hall
published
2.90
Mary Manley
published
2.72
Lynette Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Judy Roy
published
2.60
2.24
Shauna Hogg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.06
Beth Kohler
published 2.5
Susan Peck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Sanford + Shauna Hogg151054% games+2.8% vs expected
Lynette Sanford + Mary Manley224 matchesnot enough data
Christine Eagleson + Judy Roy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hall
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Mary Manley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Lynette Sanford
93W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Judy Roy
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Christine Eagleson
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Shauna Hogg
41W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Beth Kohler
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Susan Peck
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.