Teams

KMoss/SWhitney (Life Time)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-04vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Rooney / Stacey Whitney vs ANGELA BOREK / Sheila Passenant6-1, 6-3
2022-09-20vs SNakai (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Mindy Rooney vs Cynthia Spera / Maria del Mar Vazquez6-3, 7-5
2022-09-13vs THyso (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Mindy Rooney vs Jennifer Boyd / Debbie Alexander6-2, 6-3
2022-09-13vs LStrump/JCarnahan (Palisades CC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Moran / Stacey Whitney vs Lisa Gregoire / Cindy Harty6-4, 6-4
2022-09-06vs JDerrico (BCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Mindy Rooney vs Kimberly Guth / Terri Kletch0-6, 3-6
2022-08-23vs CMiles (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Mindy Rooney vs Melina Adcock / Christine Miles6-1, 6-3
2022-08-16vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Whitney / Mindy Rooney vs Kathy Harborne / Marion Mande6-4, 6-2
2022-08-09vs KSummers (Foxcroft East)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Mindy Rooney vs Leslie Lowery / Kiera Young6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Stacey Whitney
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.32
Mindy Rooney
published
Robin Estridge
published 3.5
3.23
Karen Papaleo
published
3.21
Wendi Peters
published
2.86
Jean Kreisher
published
2.80
2.75
Elizabeth Myers
published 3
2.67
Karen Moran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Myers + Catherine Holwager5157% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacey Whitney
180W–137L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Mindy Rooney
29W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Robin Estridge
27W–58L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Papaleo
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Wendi Peters
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Jean Kreisher
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Catherine Holwager
7W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Elizabeth Myers
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Heather Tselentis
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Karen Moran
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.