Teams

SOQUEL HS 40AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-22vs CHAMISAL TC 40AM3.5ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Fleming / Richard van der Linde vs Mike Panlilio / Robert Silva2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJohnny McGuire vs Rob Simpson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRon McMinn / Gregory LeBaron vs Trevor Thompson / Jason Retterer6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRick Jacobson / Glenn Blackler vs Brad Barbeau / Edward King6-1, 6-3
2025-01-19vs CHAMISAL TC 40AM3.5ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesJohn Greene / Richard van der Linde vs Mike Panlilio / Robert Silva4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEric Ferrante vs Clancy D'Angelo6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNicholas Meier / Rick Jacobson vs Trevor Thompson / David Stewart3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael St Shepard / Dennis Lim vs Steven Schumann / Jason Retterer7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Gregory LeBaron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Glenn Blackler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Michael St Shepard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
David Fleming
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Russ Elliot
published
3.26
Johnny McGuire
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Rick Jacobson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
John Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Richard van der Linde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jack Kirchner
published
3.14
Ron McMinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Nicholas Meier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Ferrante
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Fleming + Gregory LeBaron134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gregory LeBaron
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Glenn Blackler
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Michael St Shepard
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
David Fleming
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Russ Elliot
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Johnny McGuire
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Rick Jacobson
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
John Greene
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Richard van der Linde
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Jack Kirchner
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Ron McMinn
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Nicholas Meier
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Eric Ferrante
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.