Teams

THull (Life Time)

2024 Summer Doubles USTA Flex League · 3.5 Men; Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-30vs TZimmer (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Malecki / Damian Hamp-Adams vs John Scovanner / Trevor Zimmer1-6, 3-6
2024-07-21vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Malecki / Damian Hamp-Adams vs Ian Klass / Mike Thompson2-6, 3-6
2024-07-14vs MKinser (CSRC); CLT ACLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Daniel Malecki vs Forrest Stewart / Matt Kinser4-6, 2-6
2024-07-10vs TDeichmann (Park Rd)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Malecki / Jeff Cohen vs Tripp Deichmann / Paul Funkhouser3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-27vs MKinser (CSRC); CLT ACWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Daniel Malecki vs Forrest Stewart / Jay Pfeifer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-26vs BShamanis (Southpark)Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Damian Hamp-Adams vs Benjamin Shamanis / Thomas Kelly6-4, 7-5
2024-06-13vs PHurrell (CSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Malecki / Jeff Cohen vs Preston Hurrell / Phillip Kinney6-2, 2-1
2024-06-06vs TZimmer (PPRSC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Daniel Malecki vs Trevor Zimmer / Travis Smith6-0, 6-1
2024-05-30vs MThompson (Windyrush)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Malecki / Thomas Hull vs Ian Klass / Matthew Hembree3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Thomas Hull
published
3.52
Damian Hamp-Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jeff Cohen
published
3.21
Daniel Malecki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Hull + Damian Hamp-Adams404 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Malecki + Damian Hamp-Adams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Hull
49W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Damian Hamp-Adams
76W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jeff Cohen
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Daniel Malecki
39W–64L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.