Teams

UPTA18FF/LONERGAN/THORNBLADE

2023 Fun Fall 18 & over-UPTA · 3.5 Women FF

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Jennifer van Gieson
published
3.34
Aimee Lonergan
published 3.5
3.20
Jill Seeley
published
3.11
Angela Joffe
published 3.5
3.09
Pamela Finigan
published
3.02
Kristy Rogers
published
3.02
Jill Thompson
published
2.92
Erin Byxbee
published
2.81
Patty B Counihan
published
2.80
Sena Claxton
published
2.65
Melanie Brake
published
Emily Oglesby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Rogers + Aimee Lonergan6256% games+11.2% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Jill Thompson3448% games+9.6% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Angela Joffe3643% games+8.9% vs expected
Melanie Brake + Erin Byxbee9453% games+6.4% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Angela Joffe3548% games+1.1% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Patty B Counihan3642% games−2.4% vs expected
Jill Thompson + Aimee Lonergan314 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Finigan + Jill Thompson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer van Gieson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Aimee Lonergan
24W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Jill Seeley
49W–28L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.20
3.5
Angela Joffe
28W–34L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Pamela Finigan
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
Kristy Rogers
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
Jill Thompson
22W–36L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Erin Byxbee
54W–35L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Patty B Counihan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.81
Sena Claxton
14W–33L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Melanie Brake
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
0%14%86%
2.65
Emily Oglesby
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.