Teams

CSU GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27Won 21
W#1 DoublesJake Milliken / Ian Duque vs Colby Mueller / Craig Smith7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDavid Augustine vs Chris Ahn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIan Hay-Arthur / Brenden Arndt vs Daniel Jackson / Harim Gonzalez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNoah Sussman / Ian Duque vs Ian Powers / Dylan Hatanelas2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJake Milliken vs Sam Bell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesIan Hay-Arthur / Brenden Arndt vs Wil Hotz / Adam Baker1-6, 3-6
2026-08-06vs MLF BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesDavid Augustine vs Zac Wyse6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNoah Sussman / Ian Hay-Arthur vs Ken Kawakami / Michael Dirvonas6-0, 7-5
2026-07-23Split 11
W#1 DoublesJake Milliken / Ian Hay-Arthur vs Ryan Selby / Shawn Farnell6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Augustine / Noah Sussman vs Colby Mueller / Harim Gonzalez4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Burke Reilly
published 4.5
4.35
David Augustine
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Jake Milliken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Ian Hay-Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.19
Noah Sussman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Brenden Arndt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenden Arndt + Ian Hay-Arthur123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Burke Reilly
12W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.40
4.5
David Augustine
5W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Jake Milliken
42W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Ian Hay-Arthur
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Noah Sussman
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Brenden Arndt
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.