Teams

RGildehaus-YMCA

2026 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-23vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMario Vidich vs Timothy Buckley6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Adam Strom6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVincent Illiano vs Bob Stocking6-4, 6-3
2026-06-16vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesDavid Grose vs Randy Cubrilovic7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMario Vidich vs Adam Strom7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesVincent Illiano vs Timothy Buckley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-09vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesDavid Holub vs Adam Strom7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Steve Dischinger6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRalph Gildehaus vs Timothy Buckley5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-02vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesEd Holub vs Adam Strom6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDavid Grose vs Timothy Buckley6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesMario Vidich vs Randy Cubrilovic1-6, 4-6
2026-05-26vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesChris Roessler vs Adam Strom6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesEd Holub vs Bob Stocking4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDavid Holub vs Randy Cubrilovic6-3, 6-1
2026-05-19vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKarl-Dimiter Bissig vs Randy Cubrilovic6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChris Roessler vs Timothy Buckley6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRalph Gildehaus vs Gary Glish6-3, 7-6
2026-05-12vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesEd Holub vs Bob Stocking6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesVincent Illiano vs Adam Strom5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Steve Dischinger6-2, 6-2
2026-05-05vs RCubrilovic-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKarl-Dimiter Bissig vs Gary Glish6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEd Holub vs Steve Dischinger6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesDavid Grose vs Timothy Buckley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RGildehaus-YMCA802228156
2RCubrilovic-CHTC0822244281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
David Grose
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Karl-Dimiter Bissig
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Mario Vidich
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.51
Chris Roessler
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Ed Holub
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Derek Saccoccio
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
David Holub
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Vincent Illiano
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.5% vs expected
David Grose + Chris Roessler3450% games−1.8% vs expected
Derek Saccoccio + Ed Holub7163% gamesnot enough data
Vincent Illiano + Derek Saccoccio4159% gamesnot enough data
Vincent Illiano + Ralph Gildehaus224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Grose
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.60
Karl-Dimiter Bissig
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Mario Vidich
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Chris Roessler
41W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Ed Holub
78W–28L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Derek Saccoccio
132W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
David Holub
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Vincent Illiano
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
Ralph Gildehaus
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.