Teams

TeamRiviera

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.41 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Amy Morrow
published 4
3.73
3.68
ALEJANDRA GIL
published 3.5
3.46
Melanie Horowitz
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.38
Patty Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Alejandra Taylor
published 3.5
3.30
Adriana Monsalve
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.29
Maria Riccobono
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Belkys Ortiz
published 3.5
3.15
Brooklyn Maguire
published 3.5
3.05
Sima Sadoughi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Roselin Barrena
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.92
Beatriz Terry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Heidi Funke
published 3
2.74
Maria Celeste Arraras
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Rina Saborio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roselin Barrena + Maria Celeste Arraras5845% games−2.5% vs expected
Rina Saborio + Beatriz Terry033 matchesnot enough data
Adriana Monsalve + Patty Gonzalez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Morrow
32W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Caterina Castello
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
ALEJANDRA GIL
60W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.68
3.5
Melanie Horowitz
80W–49L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Patty Gonzalez
92W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Alejandra Taylor
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Adriana Monsalve
181W–83L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Maria Riccobono
151W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Belkys Ortiz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brooklyn Maguire
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sima Sadoughi
207W–136L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Roselin Barrena
88W–46L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Beatriz Terry
79W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Heidi Funke
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Maria Celeste Arraras
62W–97L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Rina Saborio
58W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.64
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.53
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.