Teams

Floyd/18/4.5/M/BTC

2024 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.5 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-14vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesSteven Floyd / Stafford Lyons vs Woodus Humphrey / William Downs1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKody Anderson vs Jared Stanton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJared Fry / Jonah Jones vs Mike Wayda / Norman Duhon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCameron Semmes vs James Wilson6-3, 6-2
2024-04-07vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSteven Floyd / Stafford Lyons vs Grady Wilson / Franklin Roemer6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJonah Jones vs James Wilson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Lauseng / Jared Fry vs Woodus Humphrey / Norman Duhon5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKody Anderson vs William Downs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-24vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesSteven Floyd / Graham Stephenson vs Grady Wilson / Woodus Humphrey3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStafford Lyons vs James Wilson5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRidge Creech / Jared Fry vs Emile Geneux / Norman Duhon6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJonah Jones vs Jared Stanton6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKody Anderson / Michael Lauseng vs William Downs / Mike Wayda6-3, 6-4
2024-03-17vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesWill Street / Stafford Lyons vs Grady Wilson / William Downs5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKody Anderson vs James Wilson7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteven Floyd / Ridge Creech vs William Whitman / Norman Duhon6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGraham Stephenson vs Jared Stanton6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJared Fry / Michael Lauseng vs Stevie Schmidt / Franklin Roemer1-6, 2-6
2024-03-10vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesJonathon Clark / Jared Fry vs Stevie Schmidt / William Whitman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStafford Lyons vs Woodus Humphrey6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Floyd / Cameron Semmes vs Grady Wilson / Norman Duhon6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichael Lauseng vs Jared Stanton5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKody Anderson / Jonah Jones vs Mike Wayda / Ted Takara6-1, 6-1
2024-02-25vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesJonathon Clark / Kody Anderson vs Woodus Humphrey / Franklin Roemer6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRidge Creech vs William Downs6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteven Schwab / Steven Floyd vs Emile Geneux / Norman Duhon6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesGraham Stephenson vs James Wilson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarc Paz / Stafford Lyons vs Ted Takara / Mike Wayda6-1, 6-1
2024-02-18vs Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesJonathon Clark / Steven Floyd vs Mike Wayda / Norman Duhon6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMarc Paz vs Ted Takara6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Schwab / Graham Stephenson vs Woodus Humphrey / Stevie Schmidt6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStafford Lyons vs James Wilson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWill Street / Ridge Creech vs Grady Wilson / William Whitman6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Floyd/18/4.5/M/BTC6126924262
2Wilson/4.5/18/M/POTC1692653355

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Jonathon Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.52
Marc Paz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Will Street
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Ridge Creech
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Graham Stephenson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Kody Anderson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Cameron Semmes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Stafford Lyons
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.97
Jared Fry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Michael Lauseng
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jonah Jones
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Steven Schwab
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Lauseng + Jared Fry2348% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathon Clark
15W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
4.54
Marc Paz
18W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.52
Will Street
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
Ridge Creech
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Graham Stephenson
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kody Anderson
18W–2L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Cameron Semmes
35W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
Stafford Lyons
16W–8L career · 7 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.12
Jared Fry
48W–23L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
Michael Lauseng
30W–18L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Jonah Jones
6W–11L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Schwab
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.