Teams

Escambia/Abel/40&Over3.0M

2023 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-29vs Tran - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJerry Clark / Beau Bullard vs Mike Esmonde / Jonathan Llanera7-5, 6-3
2023-03-22vs O'Neill - PCCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesA Haigler / Jim Smith vs Will Grace / Hurst Butts6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBobby Corbett / Jerry Clark vs Jack Williams / Shamus Prindiville6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-03-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesJim Smith / A Haigler vs Rod Hamilton / Joe Patroni6-4, 6-4
2023-03-08vs Tran - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesA Haigler / Jim Smith vs Jaymes Tran / MICHAEL CLARK6-2, 6-1
2023-03-01vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Smith / Jerry Clark vs Eric Rasmussen / Brody Mcelhany6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Craig Abel
published 3.5
Alex McCrory
published 3.5
3.19
Jerry Clark
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Clay Anderson
published 3.5
2.93
Ethan Rhone
published
2.92
Ryan Sellars
published
2.89
Beau Bullard
published 3
2.88
Tracy Schmidt
published
2.79
A Haigler
published 3
2.77
Rick Bucco
published
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Smith + Jerry Clark303 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Schmidt + Beau Bullard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Abel
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alex McCrory
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Sellars
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Beau Bullard
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tracy Schmidt
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
A Haigler
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Rick Bucco
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.