Teams

MRobbins (Queens)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-21vs AKiser (Mason Wallace)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesAustin Miller vs Alex Kiser0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Paul vs Matthew Glapiak5-7, 0-6
2025-07-07vs JTiedeman (Palisades)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRyan Poage vs Luke Townsend2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Paul vs Mathias Schmidt0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesGrant Carney vs Kevin Green1-6, 3-6
2025-07-06vs CGardner/Zelepouga (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesRyan Poage vs Anatoly Zelepouga3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAustin Miller vs Jeremy Chen6-3, 1-4
2025-07-01vs ASchulz (Alexander Street Park)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAustin Miller vs William Sinden0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMicah Robbins vs Andrew Schulz5-7, 2-3
L#3 SinglesGrant Carney vs Guilherme Dumit3-6, 0-6
2025-06-16vs AKiser (Mason Wallace)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Paul vs Chet Kristy3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMicah Robbins vs Thomas Bixler2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Poage vs Jaden Wiesinger5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMicah Robbins vs Pete Eakin0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesGrant Carney vs Kevin Siebs3-6, 0-6
2025-06-02vs JTiedeman (Palisades)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMicah Robbins vs Kasper Nielsen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAustin Miller vs Jay Tiedeman4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Poage vs Kevin Green1-6, 3-6
2025-05-19vs CGardner/Zelepouga (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAustin Miller vs Anatoly Zelepouga1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGrant Carney vs William Kenny6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Micah Robbins
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.88
Warren Stanton
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.88
Austin Miller
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.87
Grant Carney
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Michael Paul
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Ryan Poage
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grant Carney + Ryan Poage044 matchesnot enough data
Austin Miller + Micah Robbins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Micah Robbins
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Warren Stanton
57W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Austin Miller
119W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Grant Carney
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Michael Paul
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Poage
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.