← Teams

MAC-Maletteri/Thomas

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
June Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Lori Bernhardt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
—
Michaela Bancud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Susie Jansky
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Lowthian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2022-03-27Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAnn Martel / Michaela Bancud vs Heather Dudley / Kristi Vargas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJeanette Thomas vs Mayla Morgan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Susie Jansky vs Carrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana McKillop / Fanny Adams vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Susan Suttich6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-27Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Dana McKillop vs Karen Dellinger / Traci Harris6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJeanette Thomas vs Hong Jones7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-18Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Ann Martel vs Linda Christeson / Teresa Jackson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLori Bernhardt vs Kaeanna Fredrickson6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Meagher / Susie Jansky vs Susan Branam / Chrys Culver6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDana McKillop / Mary Murphy vs Estera Clark / Leslie Bridwell6-4, 7-6
2022-02-13Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesJeanette Thomas vs Laura Berta6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJune Kim / Fanny Adams vs Emily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana McKillop / Lori Bernhardt vs Kelly Bartlett / Colleen Hamilton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-12Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Michaela Bancud vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Susie Jansky vs Tarynn Berkman / Mary Green-Zwemke6-4, 6-1
2022-01-30Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesJeanette Thomas vs Leslie Jones1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana McKillop / Lori Bernhardt vs Kelly Asbridge / Stephanie Jones2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusie Jansky / Ann Martel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-23Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Lori Bernhardt vs Christy Strange / Mary Klinger6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJune Kim / Fanny Adams vs JENNIFER BELOY / Tammy Carter6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJeanette Thomas vs Gina Ossanna6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Amanda Lowthian vs Courtney Storrs / Gabriela McIntosh7-5, 7-6
2022-01-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Ann Martel vs Brooke Daugherty / Catherine Crosby6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Rebecca Roberts vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Jessica Khalili7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Susie Jansky vs Shamera Daugherty / Patricia Board6-4, 6-0
2021-12-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSusie Jansky / Della Shanley vs Julie Bradford / Kathleen Murrin6-4, 6-3
2021-12-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSusie Jansky / Della Shanley vs Nancy Duncan / Louanne Fuller6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
June Kim
20W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Lori Bernhardt
28W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Michaela Bancud
26W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data
—
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Amanda Lowthian
17W–39L career
13%87%0%
3.10

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.