← Teams

CGM-Kropp

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.42 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Cheryl Geisler
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Andrea Kropp
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Donna Baxter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-03-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Debbie Spitzer / Bin He6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Laura Rundle6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Wanda Ng / Mihee Park4-2
2022-03-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Itsuko Day vs Amy Ouellette / Shelby Hill7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Kim Boston6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngela Benedict / Heidi Kjos vs Dar Dragoon / Nina Hanson6-4, 7-6
2022-02-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAndrea Kropp / Angela Benedict vs Michelle Posey / Michele Desmarais6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Susan McMullin vs Susan Torch / Lee Rahr6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Hanny Tan / Jill Eilers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-20Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Michele Beaman / CeCe Neumann6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Christina Cork6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Heidi Kjos vs Katrina Heiles / Lauren Holloway6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Teresa Darling / Phyllis Ghazi6-1, 6-2
2022-02-05Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesItsuko Day / Cheryl Geisler vs Celene Robert / Morganne Hatfield6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Melissa Bartoszewski6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Susan McMullin vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Henderson / Tamara Phillips vs Kieu Lam / Ericka Nelson6-3, 7-5
2022-01-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSusan McMullin / Cheryl Geisler vs Chrys Culver / Michele O'Brien6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Nichole Anglin6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Tamara Phillips vs Michele Hart / Lisa Barsotti6-2, 6-0
2022-01-15Lost 1–4
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Pamela Minor vs Suzanne Chambers / Naun Yvonne Kim6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Elizabeth Cook6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Duckworth / Tamara Phillips vs Jennifer Noble / Marilyn Sims6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesHeidi Kjos vs Kylie Kollar6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Susan McMullin vs Kathy Cook / Ann Skoog6-4, 6-4
2022-01-08Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Kim Hasle / Michelle Posey6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Bethany Bounds5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Itsuko Day vs Michele Desmarais / Terri Gotcher6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Caroline Popma / Hanny Tan7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Cheryl Geisler
124W–100L career
0%97%3%
3.39
3.5
Andrea Kropp
51W–81L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3.5
Donna Baxter
15W–57L career · type A
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.