Teams

Las Tuty's de Guayama - Ruth Rosario

Adult 18 &Over 2026 · 2026 18 & Over Women 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PUERTO RICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-18vs CTH Court Divas - Jose ZofakisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarynes Colon / Ashley Morales vs Silvia Nieves Cordero / Kayra Calcano Nieves2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregorina A Lara Perez vs Ariana Zofakis0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisbeth Morales / Elba I Ortiz Morales vs Dorma Lugo / Ivette Linares6-2, 6-3
2026-06-14vs CTH Court Divas - Jose ZofakisLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobexi Angeli / Lisbeth Morales vs Silvia Nieves Cordero / Dorma Lugo1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGregorina A Lara Perez vs Ariana Zofakis0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMia R Quinones Angeli / Elba I Ortiz Morales vs Odemaris Castro / Lymarie Alicea6-1, 6-3
2026-06-13vs CTH Court Divas - Jose ZofakisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMia R Quinones Angeli / Gregorina A Lara Perez vs Silvia Nieves Cordero / Dorma Lugo5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisbeth Morales vs Kayra Calcano Nieves1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobexi Angeli / Ingrid Rodriguez vs Ivette Linares / Odemaris Castro6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMia R Quinones Angeli / Elba I Ortiz Morales vs Aura Deleon / Julianne Collazo6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGregorina A Lara Perez vs Angelina Edwards0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLourdes Rosario / Nicy Rosario vs Olya Skrabatun / Sisi Luo0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesIngrid Rodriguez / Elba I Ortiz Morales vs Sara Martinez / Aneris Bonilla6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMia R Quinones Angeli vs Ariana Rodriguez Martinez3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobexi Angeli / Ashley Morales vs Andrea Fabre / Paola Gonzalez6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesRobexi Angeli / Lisbeth Morales vs Katherine Bugajski / Daniela Bermudez1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMia R Quinones Angeli vs Angelina Edwards3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarynes Colon / Ashley Morales vs Olya Skrabatun / Sisi Luo6-2, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMia R Quinones Angeli / Lisbeth Morales vs Sara Martinez / Ariana Rodriguez Martinez6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIngrid Rodriguez vs Gabriela Lourido6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarynes Colon / Ashley Morales vs Andrea Fabre / Keila Narvaez6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesNicy Rosario / Elba I Ortiz Morales vs Sisi Luo / Olya Skrabatun2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMia R Quinones Angeli vs Julianne Collazo6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobexi Angeli / Lisbeth Morales vs Daniela Bermudez / Katherine Bugajski3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRobexi Angeli / Lisbeth Morales vs Sara Martinez / Aneris Bonilla7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLourdes Rosario vs Ariana Rodriguez Martinez3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarynes Colon / Ingrid Rodriguez vs Gabriela Lourido / Maria I Ortiz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Ruth Rosario
published
2.39
Lisbeth Morales
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.37
Ingrid Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Elba I Ortiz Morales
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.28
Mia R Quinones Angeli
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.25
Marynes Colon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.19
Fenechia Polanco
published 2.5
2.18
Ashley Morales
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.00
Robexi Angeli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.85
Nicy Rosario
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.84
Gregorina A Lara Perez
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Lourdes Rosario
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robexi Angeli + Lisbeth Morales134 matchesnot enough data
Marynes Colon + Ashley Morales213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Rosario
22W–49L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Lisbeth Morales
5W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Ingrid Rodriguez
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Elba I Ortiz Morales
5W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Mia R Quinones Angeli
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Marynes Colon
22W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Fenechia Polanco
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Ashley Morales
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Robexi Angeli
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Nicy Rosario
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
2.5
Gregorina A Lara Perez
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Lourdes Rosario
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.