Teams

MARIN TC 18AM4.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-06-11vs TIBURON PEN C 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDerek Boorse / Michael Lustenberger vs Jeff Barcy / Jesse Eisenhardt5-7, 5-7
2022-05-05vs TIBURON PEN C 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDerek Boorse / John Honey vs Timothy Poulin / Jordan Warren4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Christopher Brawer
published 4.5
3.91
3.90
Matthew Littrell
published
3.84
Kevin Dufficy
published
3.81
Carnet Williams
published 4
3.78
Robert Ahearn
published
3.75
Jason Tuttle
published
Gary Lenoff
published 4
Gary Russillo
published 4
3.72
John Honey
published
3.67
Jason Holmes
published
3.51
Igor Scherba
published 3.5
3.49
Vladimir Matyurin
published
3.44
Steve Juliani
published
3.35
Derek Boorse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
David Shepard
published 3.5
3.18
Babak Jamasbi
published 3.5
Mike Schulist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Ahearn + Michael Lustenberger044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Brawer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Matthew Littrell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kevin Dufficy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Carnet Williams
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Jason Tuttle
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gary Lenoff
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gary Russillo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Honey
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Igor Scherba
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Vladimir Matyurin
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Steve Juliani
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 2 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
David Shepard
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Babak Jamasbi
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Mike Schulist
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.